![]() |
| Client Side SPAM applications |
|
John
|
I am looking at a service that claims to eliminate spam by routing all email through thier server and running it against a whitelist and if that fails, replying to the sender with an email from the recipient asking them to respond to a graphic challenge. Once they have done this they are added to the whitelist and the challenge is never repeated.
I assume, and they claim, this would prevent automated SPAM. The URL is http://www.spamarrest.com/affl?4024566/howitworks/index.jsp My biggest concern is the added step required for a new sender, would it annoy potential customers? Before committing to it I would be interested to hear from anyone who has experience with this type of solution or is aware of others. But most of all, I would like to see this added to the quiver in smarter mail as a value added incentive for resellers. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
jamie
HostMySite Sales Rep
![]()
|
I know of some clients that have used this type of system, however I know that HostMySite.com will never do so because there are some inherent problems with challenge/response systems - the biggest being that it simply generates almost as much junk mail in the way of misdirected challenges than it prevents. You can see more details on this here:
http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html#CR Excerpt: Challenge/response spam filtering Description: This "selfish" method of spam filtering replies to all email with a "challenge" - a message only a living person can (theoretically) respond to. There are several problems with this method which have been well known for many years. 1. Does not scale: If everyone used this method, nobody would ever get any mail. 2. Annoying: Many users refuse to reply to the challenge emails, don't know what they are or don't trust them. 3. Ineffective: Because of confusion about these emails, many of them are confirmed by people who did not trigger them. This results in the original malicious email being delivered. 4. Selfish: This is the problem we are mainly concerned with. By using challenge/response filtering, you are asking innumerable third parties to receive your challenge emails just so that a relatively few legitimate ones get through to the intended recipient. SpamCop abandoned this method of filtering after a short test period in 2001. Another site discussing the problems with challenge/response: Challenge-Response Anti-Spam Systems Considered Harmful http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Mail/challenge-response.html |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Client Side SPAM applications |
|
||
|



