Reply to topic
Client Side SPAM applications
John


Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 3
Location: Arkansas
Reply with quote
I am looking at a service that claims to eliminate spam by routing all email through thier server and running it against a whitelist and if that fails, replying to the sender with an email from the recipient asking them to respond to a graphic challenge. Once they have done this they are added to the whitelist and the challenge is never repeated.

I assume, and they claim, this would prevent automated SPAM.

The URL is http://www.spamarrest.com/affl?4024566/howitworks/index.jsp

My biggest concern is the added step required for a new sender, would it annoy potential customers?

Before committing to it I would be interested to hear from anyone who has experience with this type of solution or is aware of others.

But most of all, I would like to see this added to the quiver in smarter mail as a value added incentive for resellers. Laughing
jamie
HostMySite Sales Rep
HostMySite Sales Rep

Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 764
Location: Newark, De
Reply with quote
I know of some clients that have used this type of system, however I know that HostMySite.com will never do so because there are some inherent problems with challenge/response systems - the biggest being that it simply generates almost as much junk mail in the way of misdirected challenges than it prevents. You can see more details on this here:

http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html#CR

Excerpt:

Challenge/response spam filtering
Description: This "selfish" method of spam filtering replies to all email with a "challenge" - a message only a living person can (theoretically) respond to. There are several problems with this method which have been well known for many years.

1. Does not scale: If everyone used this method, nobody would ever get any mail.

2. Annoying: Many users refuse to reply to the challenge emails, don't know what they are or don't trust them.

3. Ineffective: Because of confusion about these emails, many of them are confirmed by people who did not trigger them. This results in the original malicious email being delivered.

4. Selfish: This is the problem we are mainly concerned with. By using challenge/response filtering, you are asking innumerable third parties to receive your challenge emails just so that a relatively few legitimate ones get through to the intended recipient.

SpamCop abandoned this method of filtering after a short test period in 2001. Another site discussing the problems with challenge/response:

Challenge-Response Anti-Spam Systems Considered Harmful http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Mail/challenge-response.html
Client Side SPAM applications
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Reply to topic